top of page

GORC Self-Assessment

(Version 1.0)

Test Your Clinical Resource Efficiency in 3 Minutes

🟢 Section 1
Surgical Material Utilization

Q1. How often are surgical materials opened but not used?

Q2. Are surgical packs regularly reviewed and optimized?

🟢 Section 2
Clinical Workflow Efficiency

Q3. Are there standardized protocols to minimize unnecessary material usage?

Q4. How often are clinical workflows reviewed for efficiency improvement?

🟢 Section 3
Inventory & Resource Management

Q5. Is there a system to track near-expiry medical supplies?

Q6. Are unused or near-expiry materials redistributed or reallocated?

🟢 Section 4
Waste Prevention Practices

Q7. Does your organization focus on preventing waste before it occurs?

Q8. Are staff trained on resource efficiency and waste reduction?

🟢 Section 5
Data & Continuous Improvement

Q9. Do you measure and track resource utilization KPIs?

Q10. Are improvement actions implemented based on data analysis?

Your Score:

Industry Avg:

Top Performers:

Category:

🟩 80–100 High Efficiency

You demonstrate a high level of clinical resource efficiency with well-established systems in place.

Potential Impact

Your organization demonstrates strong resource efficiency.
Opportunities may still exist to further optimize specific processes and achieve incremental cost savings.
​​

🟧 40–59 Improvement Needed

There are clear inefficiencies in resource utilization that may be leading to unnecessary waste and cost.

​​

Potential Impact

Your results indicate noticeable inefficiencies in resource utilization, including:

  • 15–30% potential waste in surgical materials

  • Workflow inefficiencies impacting operational performance

  • Significant opportunities for cost reduction

🟨 60–79 Moderate Efficiency

Your organization shows moderate efficiency, with opportunities for targeted improvement.

Potential Impact

Based on your responses, your organization may be experiencing:

  • 10–20% unnecessary surgical material waste

  • Inefficiencies in certain clinical workflows

  • Missed opportunities for cost optimization

🟥 <40 High Resource Waste Risk

Your organization may be experiencing significant resource waste and operational inefficiencies.

Potential Impact

Your organization may be facing substantial resource inefficiencies:

  • 20–40% potential material waste

  • Major gaps in workflow optimization

  • High risk of avoidable operational costs​

🟩 80–100 High Efficiency

You demonstrate a high level of clinical resource efficiency with well-established systems in place.

Potential Impact

Your organization demonstrates strong resource efficiency.
Opportunities may still exist to further optimize specific processes and achieve incremental cost savings.

🟨 60–79 Moderate Efficiency

Your organization shows moderate efficiency, with opportunities for targeted improvement.

Potential Impact

Based on your responses, your organization may be experiencing:

  • 10–20% unnecessary surgical material waste

  • Inefficiencies in certain clinical workflows

  • Missed opportunities for cost optimization

​​

🟧 40–59 Improvement Needed

There are clear inefficiencies in resource utilization that may be leading to unnecessary waste and cost.

​​

Potential Impact

Your results indicate noticeable inefficiencies in resource utilization, including:

  • 15–30% potential waste in surgical materials

  • Workflow inefficiencies impacting operational performance

  • Significant opportunities for cost reduction

🟥 <40 High Resource Waste Risk

Your organization may be experiencing significant resource waste and operational inefficiencies.

Potential Impact

Your organization may be facing substantial resource inefficiencies:

  • 20–40% potential material waste

  • Major gaps in workflow optimization

  • High risk of avoidable operational costs

🟩 80–100

High Efficiency

You demonstrate a high level of clinical resource efficiency with well-established systems in place.

Potential Impact

Your organization demonstrates strong resource efficiency.
Opportunities may still exist to further optimize specific processes and achieve incremental cost savings.

🟨 60–79

Moderate Efficiency

You demonstrate a high level of clinical resource efficiency with well-established systems in place.

Potential Impact

Your organization demonstrates strong resource efficiency.
Opportunities may still exist to further optimize specific processes and achieve incremental cost savings.

bottom of page